The Future and Genetics:
Would Winston Churchill have told his people about the ability to extend their lives by at least a factor of two? He did not tell the people of Coventry about the attack he knew was coming and I think he made the right decision. It was for the Greater Good that thousands of citizens I Coventry forfeited their lives because the Enigma code-breaking machine was important to a larger war effort. Of course on an even larger playing field I can argue that the war could have been stopped if the Rothschild Swiss interests had stopped laundering money and selling priceless works of art stolen from the Jews who had thrown the Benjaminite Rothschilds out of Israel on more than one occasion. It was not just the laundering of money that Switzerland supplied to the Nazi war effort. They also supplied key precision bearing and other weapons to the Reich. But Winston was not going against the greater plan to unify Europe and which Hitler had a major role in achieving. He appears to have failed to argue against the efforts of FDR’s handlers in Yalta who agreed to give Stalin a major part of post-war Europe and who were put in control of the post-war Reconstruction efforts that have lead to the European Economic Community and the inclusion of a new Russia in the G-9. These handlers include Bernard Baruch and Frank Lloyd Wright. I cannot address all of this again, in a book about mere Human Traffiking.
But it is interesting to ask ourselves would Churchill (who really did tell some truths, especially as an author after the war) be the kind of person who would tell us about gene-therapy and how it will make humans able to achieve near-immortality without having to dump themselves in sentient robots. It would be quite dangerous to existing economic and government programs to allow everyone to get such life-extending treatment. The issue is further exacerbated by robotics and the soon-to-be ability to replace most work or jobs. Are they going to allow people access to all the wealth these things will generate including space colonization? There was a little discourse in the media about these things after Bill Joy (A founder of Sun Microsystems and developer of Java.) wrote about them in 2000 and covered in Wired Magazine’s Mar/April issue.
I recently spoke to a Swiss Foreign Exchange marketing representative and told him about many things that rocked his world. Maybe you have decided to get a piece of the arbitrageur’s pie or fortune and maybe it doesn’t matter to you if your children are being trained for jobs that will soon have no value to the corporate patrons of your society. I think if Winston Churchill were around today he might try to discuss these things but his superiors would have to watch him carefully as they did near the end of his life while he enjoyed the comforts of Aristotle Onassis’s yacht. Onassis like Baruch are names that figure prominently in Merovingian research. Armaments, drugs, and bureaucracy of totalitarian design are all important in the way of the world with its Keynesian or Malthusian economic philosophy. Churchill had aided the financial unrest of the Gold Standard era and I think he learned some things in that debacle which soured his idealism or willingness to fulfill these designs.
A debate between C. H. Douglas and Lord Keynes was most instructive to the alternative approach which sees social credit and productivity valuation as a better way to manage this world for the Greater Good. National debt can be paid off and interest does not need to be given to international or supranational hegemonists. The US Dollar can be backed by the growth and asset value of the development and technological improvements provided by government just as the Silver Certificate legislation comprehended and which JFK was willing to implement against the wishes of his fellow Merovingians.
No comments:
Post a Comment